Odds are this post is going to come off as “Old Man Yells at
Cloud”, but I am frustrated. I tried to vent my frustration on some places on
the internet to no avail. Then I remembered, this is my corner
of the internet and I can say and do whatever I want here. This is going to be
a rant, and I am just doing it to get it off my chest, and release it into the
ether so I can move on. Generally, I try to be the mediating voice in
conversations, especially when it has to do with D&D. I am try to spread a
pro-D&D message regardless of edition. I don’t condone people insulting
older editions, and I do not condone people insulting 5e, mostly because I play
them both. The issue I tend to have is with the gatekeepers of the 5e world, especially
on the 5e FB main group.
Maybe I am just getting old. |
I try
to reach out to the 5e community, but one of two things are abundantly clear;
1) 5e players just do not like reading blogs, or 2) they do not like my
personal style. I make allowances for both. The truth is that when I write
articles for 5e, the juice is often not worth the squeeze as far as traffic is
concerned. I try though to reach out, I really value the opinions of the newer
generation of gamers and would love to engage with them more. I was surprised
when I posted my article on the D&D
Cartoon Review and it picked up traction. It had 100+ reactions and around
60 comments and I was having a great time conversing with the people in the
group about the topic. It was up for about 24 hours before it was pulled down
for “Not being specifically about 5e”. This is not the first time I have had an
article pulled, but this is the first time it was pulled when it had some good
momentum around it. Normally I just accept it and move on, but this time I was
angered because it was a good post.
Now was
my article FULLY about 5e, no. Though I did include at the end some best
practices for D&D and mention 5e at least once specifically. I talk about
the lessons in the episode that a DM can learn from and possibly emulate in
their home game. I discuss the cool settings and the colorful villain that
might make for interesting encounters for your players. I talk about the idea
of facing overwhelming opponents, but using non-combat tactics to subdue them,
like they do in the show. All things that could directly help a person running
5e. This time I wanted an explanation, especially because it wasn’t deemed bad
for 24 hours.
I
respectfully requested that one of the admins contact me, mostly not to get
this post put back up, but to ensure future posts will not be taken down. I
have talked with some of the admins before, each time we came to a reasonable
solution to the issue, and all parties were completely civil. This time was a
much different experience. This time I managed to get a certain admin that has
a bit of a reputation in this particular of wielding a mighty ban hammer and
using it indiscriminately. I am not going to do a word for word of our
conversation, but I will give the general overview.
Should be a ban scalpel. |
I began
by stating that I just wanted to know why post had been taken down and that
people seemed to be enjoying it. I was told that it should not have gone up,
and that it had nothing to do with 5e. I did not come to this conversation
unarmed though, because I took several screen shots of things that were approved
and seemingly had less, or at least equal to do with D&D as my post. I want
it said that I have no problem with any of the posts that I am mentioning, just
that I do not understand how they have a direct tie to 5e and my post does not
have one. To say it a second time, I did not want these other posts pulled,
just and explanation.
The
first post was an advertisement for a semi-famous play, She Kills Monsters.
This is a play about D&D, and I saw it about a year ago. The person was not
talking about 5e, just advertising the play that he is involved with in his
local area. I was told that the reason it can stay was, “They play 5e”. Ok, I
mention that I play 5e as well, and was told “Great, it’s a fun game.” Seeing
this one was not going anywhere, I moved on. The next was a post of a tin with
dice in it. I was told that “Dice are used in this edition”. Ok, how about this
one? It was a picture of someone painting a five headed dragon medallion. “Yep.
That is Tiamat.” I then go on to explain that my article several times talks
about Tiamat and I use the 5e picture of her for her representation. If having
Tiamat in general in your post is enough to get in, my post should have been
fine.
If you get a chance, go see this. |
I was asked “Is your article a review about a cartoon?” I answered in the affirmative, but also mentioned it was more than that as well. I talked about themes and troupes in D&D. Gave advice to DMs and in general had more to do with D&D than a play that was written before 5e existed. It was also a collective piece of our D&D history. “I failing to see a sufficient link with 5e”. I then try a different approach, which was to say that people were enjoying it, and were actively participating in the post. “People liking it doesn't make it right for this group. People LOVE DnD Memes. People LOVE pictures of naked people. Those don't work for our group either.” At this point it was going nowhere and we parted the conversation. I was upset, but I was going to let it go.
A few days later………
The
same admin post an article, from her own blog, about how using the terms guys,
dudes, and fellows can be offensive to women and non-binary people. The sad
thing is, I don’t disagree with her, but what does this have to do with 5e
SPECIFICALLY? There was a torrent of
hate that flew her way and the post was locked down either by her or another
admin. I do not think it was a bad article, but at a minimum it has to be equal
with mine in the amount of 5e content.
This is
the crux of the issue though. The application of the policy is incredibly
willy-nilly and in my opinion people should err on the side of the creators,
then hit something with a ban stick without reading it. I just want to produce
content and have it read by people free of charge, I don’t even have ads on my
page. I write mostly to connect with people, and that group’s 144k worth of
D&D fans is a good place to meet people.
I just had to get that off my
chest, I am going to move on with my life and try and get part 2 of the
Saturday Moring D&D out tonight or tomorrow.
An article like yours did well to connect D&D history via a cartoon to today's game. I think many people don't want to admit that the game that is played today, is not a solo project and was built upon years of play and work by many people to get things to where they are now. Also, the cartoon has TONS of great ideas for adventures and villians and things you can use for any edition but also in that non violent way of role playing.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you and that was the point of the article. I do feel that some people really want to bury anything before 5e. Like the game did not start before then.
ReplyDeleteI admire your perseverance with the pig-headed admin. To be honest, I think you've done the right thing in creating your own Facebook group, to get away from people like that. Life's too short to waste (virtual) oxygen debating with people who abuse their little bit of power.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I loved your D&D cartoon article and am looking forward to more of them. Keep up the great work.
Illegitimi non carborundum
I won't let the bastards grind me down!
ReplyDelete